TL;DR: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services modified NCD 74, its Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) coverage policy, effective March 7, 2026. Here's what billing teams need to know before submitting claims.
CMS PTT coverage policy under NCD 74 in the Medicare system draws clear lines around when a PTT test is — and isn't — medically necessary. This policy governs diagnostic laboratory claims for PTT testing, which assesses the intrinsic coagulation pathway and monitors unfractionated heparin therapy. No specific CPT codes are listed in the current policy document, but the indications and limitations carry real financial exposure if your team isn't documenting to the right standard.
Quick-Reference Table
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payer | CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) |
| Policy | Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) |
| Policy Code | NCD 74 |
| Change Type | Modified |
| Effective Date | March 7, 2026 |
| Impact Level | Medium |
| Specialties Affected | Clinical laboratory, hematology, cardiology, vascular surgery, hepatology, nephrology, surgery (pre-op), internal medicine |
| Key Action | Audit your PTT claim documentation now — especially for pre-op orders and any claims pairing PTT with PT — to confirm medical necessity is explicitly justified in the chart before March 7, 2026. |
CMS Partial Thromboplastin Time Coverage Criteria and Medical Necessity Requirements 2026
NCD 74 is the National Coverage Determination governing Medicare coverage of PTT testing under the Diagnostic Laboratory Tests benefit category. The policy is specific about when PTT clears the medical necessity bar — and when it doesn't.
CMS recognizes four main indications for covered PTT testing.
Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy. This is the most common covered use. PTT quantifies the effect of unfractionated heparin and guides dosing. If your patient is on heparin, a PTT claim is on solid ground.
Signs or symptoms of hemorrhage or thrombosis. The policy lists examples: abnormal bleeding, hemorrhage, hematoma, petechiae, signs of thrombocytopenia possibly linked to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), or a swollen extremity with or without trauma. Documentation must connect the test to the presenting symptom. Don't assume the diagnosis code carries the claim — the note needs to support it.
History of a condition associated with hemorrhage or thrombosis risk involving the intrinsic coagulation pathway. CMS lists a long set of qualifying conditions: dysfibrinogenemia, afibrinogenemia, acute or chronic liver dysfunction or failure (including Wilson's disease), hemophilia, liver disease and failure, infectious processes, bleeding disorders, DIC, lupus erythematosus, other conditions involving circulating inhibitors (Factor VIII Inhibitor, lupus-like anticoagulant), sepsis, von Willebrand's disease, arterial and venous thrombosis, hypercoagulable states, nephrosis or renal failure, and other acquired or congenital coagulopathies. This is a wide list. The key is that the condition must be linked to the intrinsic coagulation pathway — and that link needs to be in the documentation.
Pre-procedure risk assessment. A PTT is covered before a medical intervention associated with bleeding or thrombosis risk — but only when the patient has signs or symptoms of a bleeding or thrombotic abnormality, a personal history of bleeding or thrombosis, or is currently on heparin therapy. Hospital-wide protocols or standing orders don't satisfy this requirement on their own.
That last point is where a lot of claims fall apart. CMS is explicit: facility-specific protocols, by themselves, cannot justify coverage. If your institution has a blanket pre-op PTT order, those claims need individual documentation to survive audit.
Whether PTT testing is covered under Medicare depends entirely on the documentation in the medical record — not the test order alone. This coverage policy doesn't allow prior authorization as a standalone workaround. Every claim needs its own documented rationale.
CMS Partial Thromboplastin Time Exclusions and Non-Covered Indications
This is where the policy gets specific — and where claim denial risk is highest.
PTT for routine warfarin monitoring is not covered. CMS is clear: PTT does not usefully monitor the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. Ordering PTT for a patient on warfarin, without a separate clinical reason, doesn't meet medical necessity.
There are two narrow exceptions. First, PTT may be covered during the transition from heparin to warfarin — specifically as heparin is being discontinued. Second, PTT may be covered when the PT is markedly prolonged due to warfarin toxicity. Outside of those scenarios, routine PTT-plus-PT pairing on warfarin patients is a red flag.
PTT and PT ordered together without separate justification. CMS states that, except during heparin-to-warfarin transitions, ordering both PTT and PT to assess anticoagulation therapy is generally not necessary. Each test must be justified separately. If your team routinely orders both as a panel, audit those claims. You need individual clinical rationale documented for each test.
Pre-op PTT without clinical indication. As noted above, pre-operative PTT based solely on a facility protocol doesn't qualify. The patient must have signs, symptoms, or a personal history of a bleeding or thrombotic condition — or must be on heparin therapy.
Repeat testing without documented change. The need to repeat PTT is driven by changes in the patient's underlying medical condition or heparin dosing. Serial PTT orders on a stable patient, without documented changes, are vulnerable. Make sure your notes reflect what changed and why the repeat test was ordered.
Coverage Indications at a Glance
| Indication | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy | Covered | Most common use; documents heparin effect and guides dosing |
| Signs or symptoms of hemorrhage or thrombosis (e.g., abnormal bleeding, hematoma, petechiae, swollen extremity) | Covered | Symptom must be documented in the clinical note |
| History of condition associated with intrinsic coagulation pathway risk (hemophilia, DIC, liver disease, lupus, von Willebrand's, sepsis, renal failure, hypercoagulable states, etc.) | Covered | Condition-to-pathway link must be explicit in documentation |
| Pre-procedure risk assessment (personal/family history of bleeding or thrombosis, or patient on heparin) | Covered | Individual clinical rationale required; facility protocols alone are not sufficient |
| Routine warfarin monitoring | Not Covered | PTT does not usefully monitor warfarin effect |
| PTT + PT ordered together for anticoagulation monitoring (outside heparin-to-warfarin transition) | Not Covered | Each test must be separately justified |
| PTT during heparin-to-warfarin transition | Covered | Narrow exception to warfarin limitation |
| PTT when PT is markedly prolonged due to warfarin toxicity | Covered | Narrow exception; toxicity must be documented |
| Pre-op PTT based solely on facility protocol | Not Covered | Clinical indication required; hospital standing orders are not sufficient alone |
| Repeat PTT without documented clinical change | Not Covered | Repeat testing must be tied to change in condition or heparin dose |
CMS Partial Thromboplastin Time Billing Guidelines and Action Items 2026
The real issue with NCD 74 isn't complexity — the policy is readable. The issue is documentation discipline. Here's what to do before March 7, 2026.
| # | Action Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | Audit your pre-op PTT claims now. Pull claims from the past 90 days where PTT was ordered before a surgical or invasive procedure. Check whether the supporting documentation shows a clinical indication — not just a standing protocol. Flag anything that rests on facility-wide policy alone and correct your process before the effective date. |
| 2 | Train your ordering physicians on the warfarin exclusion. The routine warfarin-plus-PTT order is a well-known billing problem. Make sure your hospitalists, cardiologists, and anticoagulation clinic staff know that PTT for warfarin monitoring doesn't meet medical necessity under Medicare — and that exceptions require explicit documentation of the clinical reason. |
| 3 | Stop bundling PTT and PT without separate justification. If your EHR has a coagulation panel order that pulls both PTT and PT by default, review that order set. CMS PTT billing guidelines require each test to stand on its own medical necessity. One order with one generic reason won't hold up if a MAC audits the claim. |
| 4 | Tighten your repeat-testing documentation. For patients with serial PTT orders — especially those on heparin drips — make sure each order is tied to a documented change: a heparin dose adjustment, a clinical status change, or a specific monitoring interval supported by the patient's condition. "Continue to monitor" is not enough. |
| 5 | Document the intrinsic pathway connection explicitly. For patients with conditions like lupus, liver disease, or renal failure, the medical record needs to show why PTT is relevant to that patient's intrinsic coagulation pathway — not just that the condition exists. If your providers aren't writing that connection into their notes, reimbursement for those claims is at risk. |
| 6 | Verify your lab's PTT billing setup. This policy does not list specific CPT codes in the current document. Confirm with your laboratory billing team which CPT code(s) you're using for PTT and aPTT testing, and make sure your documentation requirements align with NCD 74 criteria. If you're unsure how your lab's charge capture maps to this policy, talk to your compliance officer before the effective date. |
| Previous Version | Current Version |
|---|---|
| Coverage is considered experimental and investigational for all indications | Coverage is considered medically necessary when specific criteria are met |
| Prior authorization is not required | Prior authorization is required for initial treatment |
| Documentation must include clinical history | Documentation must include clinical history |
| Re-review every 24 months | Re-review every 12 months with updated clinical documentation |
CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-10 Codes for Partial Thromboplastin Time Under NCD 74
The current NCD 74 policy document does not list specific CPT, HCPCS, or ICD-10 codes. CMS notes that applicable codes are published in quarterly Covered Code Lists — refer to those lists directly on the CMS website for the current code-level detail.
This is a real gap if you're trying to build or validate your charge capture. Don't assume your existing PTT code mapping is correct without cross-referencing the current quarterly Covered Code List. CMS also directs billers to Chapter 120 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Clinical Laboratory Services Based on Negotiated Rulemaking, for claims processing instructions.
For PTT billing, work with your laboratory billing team to confirm the specific CPT codes in your charge master, then validate each against the indications in NCD 74. If the quarterly list shows a code with coverage restrictions, your documentation requirements need to match.
The absence of codes in the policy body itself isn't a free pass. CMS can and does deny PTT claims when the documentation doesn't match the indication criteria — regardless of whether the code itself appears on a covered list.
Get the Full Picture
Track this policy across versions, search 1,500+ policies by CPT code, and get real-time alerts when any payer changes coverage.