TL;DR: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services modified NCD 350 governing verteporfin coverage, with an effective date of January 9, 2026. Here's what billing teams need to know before submitting claims.
CMS verteporfin coverage policy under NCD 350 Medicare has been updated. This policy covers ocular photodynamic therapy (OPT) with verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The policy does not list specific CPT or HCPCS codes, but verteporfin billing teams at ophthalmology and retina practices need to understand the updated medical necessity criteria before claims go out.
Quick-Reference Table
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payer | CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) |
| Policy | Verteporfin — NCD 350 | CMS Coverage Update |
| Policy Code | NCD 350 |
| Change Type | Modified |
| Effective Date | January 9, 2026 |
| Impact Level | Medium |
| Specialties Affected | Ophthalmology, Retina Specialists, Ocular Oncology |
| Key Action | Audit your documentation protocols for CNV lesion classification and progression evidence before submitting verteporfin claims |
CMS Verteporfin Coverage Criteria and Medical Necessity Requirements 2026
NCD 350 is the National Coverage Determination governing Medicare coverage of verteporfin used in ocular photodynamic therapy (OPT). Verteporfin is a benzoporphyrin derivative administered intravenously. It is a photosensitive drug with an absorption peak of 690 nm, and it only qualifies for coverage when used incident to a physician's service during OPT.
The FDA first approved verteporfin on April 12, 2000. It was added to the United States Pharmacopoeia on July 18, 2000, which is what makes it a drug under §1861(t)(1) of the Social Security Act. That matters for your reimbursement pathway — it establishes the legal basis for Medicare coverage under the drugs and biologicals benefit category.
The CMS verteporfin coverage policy is tighter than many billing teams realize. Coverage is not automatic just because a patient has AMD. The diagnosis alone does not trigger reimbursement. You need the right lesion type, the right imaging documentation, and — in two of the three covered indications — evidence of recent progression.
Predominantly Classic Subfoveal CNV
This is the strongest covered indication. The patient must have predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV), meaning the classic CNV component makes up 50% or more of the total lesion area. You need a fluorescein angiogram (FA) at the initial visit to establish this.
For subsequent visits, CMS accepts either an FA or an optical coherence tomography (OCT) to document treatment response. The OCT option has been effective since April 3, 2013. This is the most flexible of the three covered indications — there are no restrictions on visual acuity, lesion size, or number of retreatments.
Subfoveal Occult with No Classic CNV
This indication covers subfoveal occult CNV associated with AMD where no classic component is present. But this is where medical necessity requirements get more demanding. This indication is only covered when two specific criteria are both met.
First, the lesion must be small — four disk areas or less in size — at initial treatment or within the three months before initial treatment. Second, the lesion must show evidence of progression within those same three months before initial treatment.
What counts as progression? CMS is specific. You need documented deterioration of visual acuity (at least five letters lost on a standard eye chart), lesion growth of at least one disk area, or the appearance of blood associated with the lesion. All three are acceptable, but at least one must be documented.
Subfoveal Minimally Classic CNV
This third covered indication applies when the classic CNV component is present but occupies less than 50% of the total lesion area — hence "minimally classic." The same two-part progression and size criteria from the occult indication apply here as well.
If your lesion does not meet both the size threshold and the documented progression requirement, the claim will fail medical necessity. This is one of the more common claim denial triggers for verteporfin billing. Get the documentation right before you submit.
Prior Authorization Under NCD 350
The policy does not explicitly require prior authorization as a separate step. Coverage flows from meeting the documented medical necessity criteria. That said, if you're billing in a jurisdiction where your Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) has supplemental guidance, check for local LCD overlays. Some MACs add prior auth or pre-certification requirements on top of the NCD framework.
CMS Verteporfin Exclusions and Non-Covered Indications
NCD 350 is explicit about what CMS will not cover. These exclusions are nationally binding — no MAC can override them at the local level.
CMS will not cover OPT with verteporfin for juxtafoveal or extrafoveal CNV lesions. If the lesion sits outside the fovea, it is not covered, period. This is a hard line in the coverage policy.
Two other non-covered situations: inability to obtain an FA (which blocks the imaging documentation requirement at initial visit), and atrophic or "dry" AMD. Dry AMD is the most common form of macular degeneration. Billing verteporfin for dry AMD is not a gray area — it is nationally non-covered. Any claim for that indication will be denied.
The policy also states that other uses of OPT with verteporfin not already addressed by CMS remain non-covered. This language is deliberately broad. It means CMS is not authorizing any off-label expansion of coverage at the national level.
What About Pathologic Myopia and Ocular Histoplasmosis?
These two indications — pathologic myopia and presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome — are not nationally covered or excluded. CMS defers these to individual MAC discretion through local coverage determinations (LCDs).
If your patient population includes these diagnoses, contact your MAC directly. Coverage will vary by region. Do not assume national coverage applies.
Coverage Indications at a Glance
| Indication | Status | Imaging Required | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predominantly classic subfoveal CNV (≥50% classic component) | Covered | FA at initial visit; FA or OCT at follow-up | No restrictions on visual acuity, lesion size, or retreatment count |
| Subfoveal occult CNV with no classic component | Covered with Criteria | FA at initial visit | Lesion ≤4 disk areas AND documented progression within 3 months required |
| Subfoveal minimally classic CNV (<50% classic component) | Covered with Criteria | FA at initial visit | Same size and progression requirements as occult indication |
| Juxtafoveal or extrafoveal CNV | Not Covered | N/A | Nationally non-covered; lesion outside fovea |
| Atrophic ("dry") AMD | Not Covered | N/A | Nationally non-covered; no exception pathway |
| Inability to obtain FA | Not Covered | N/A | Cannot meet initial documentation requirement |
| Pathologic myopia | MAC Discretion | Determined by MAC | Eligible for local coverage determination |
| Presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome | MAC Discretion | Determined by MAC | Eligible for local coverage determination |
CMS Verteporfin Billing Guidelines and Action Items 2026
The January 9, 2026 effective date is already past. If your practice performs OPT with verteporfin, these steps apply to claims you're submitting right now.
| # | Action Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm your lesion classification documentation at the chart level. Every verteporfin claim needs FA documentation that clearly identifies the CNV lesion type and the percentage of classic vs. occult components. If your notes don't specify whether the classic component is ≥50% or <50%, you cannot support the correct medical necessity rationale. |
| 2 | For occult and minimally classic indications, build a checklist for progression documentation. You need at least one of three documented findings: five-letter visual acuity decline, one disk area of lesion growth, or appearance of blood. Make this a standard part of your pre-visit workflow. The documentation window is three months before initial treatment. |
| 3 | Update your follow-up visit documentation protocols. For predominantly classic CNV, CMS accepts either FA or OCT at follow-up visits to document treatment response. Make sure your billing team knows that both imaging types qualify — and that the report is in the chart before the claim goes out. |
| 4 | Do not bill verteporfin for dry AMD or extrafoveal lesions. This sounds obvious, but mixed AMD presentations can blur clinical lines at the documentation level. If your physician notes include AMD without specifying the lesion type and location, your coder cannot confirm medical necessity. Create a standing query process so coders flag charts that lack lesion specificity before billing. |
| 5 | Check your MAC for local coverage determinations on pathologic myopia and ocular histoplasmosis. NCD 350 punts these to the MAC level. If your practice treats either condition with OPT and verteporfin, call your MAC or check their LCD database. Coverage — and documentation requirements — will differ by contractor. |
| 6 | Review your claim denial patterns for verteporfin from Q4 2025. If you had denials under the previous version of this policy, compare those denial reasons against the updated criteria. A pattern of denials for insufficient progression documentation or lesion size thresholds tells you exactly where your intake forms need to change. |
| 7 | If your billing and compliance teams are unsure how this modified policy maps to your patient mix, talk to your compliance officer before submitting further claims. The distinction between minimally classic and predominantly classic CNV is a clinical call, and your coding has to match the physician's documented assessment. A mismatch is an audit risk. |
| Previous Version | Current Version |
|---|---|
| Coverage is considered experimental and investigational for all indications | Coverage is considered medically necessary when specific criteria are met |
| Prior authorization is not required | Prior authorization is required for initial treatment |
| Documentation must include clinical history | Documentation must include clinical history |
| Re-review every 24 months | Re-review every 12 months with updated clinical documentation |
CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-10 Codes for Verteporfin Under NCD 350
The policy data for NCD 350 does not include specific CPT or HCPCS codes. CMS did not publish a code list as part of this coverage determination update.
For verteporfin billing, your practice will typically use a HCPCS drug code for the verteporfin itself and a procedure code for the OPT administration. The exact codes in use at your practice should be confirmed against the current CMS HCPCS fee schedule and your MAC's claims processing instructions.
Reference Transmittal 2728 (Medicare Claims Processing) for claims processing guidance tied to this policy. This transmittal is the operative claims processing instruction document linked directly to NCD 350.
What to Do in the Absence of a Published Code List
Contact your MAC's provider relations line and confirm the HCPCS codes they expect for verteporfin drug billing and OPT procedure billing. Verify that your charge master reflects those codes before submitting. Do not assume the codes in your current charge capture are current — drug and procedure codes for photodynamic therapy have evolved since the original 2004 coverage effective date.
Get the Full Picture
Track this policy across versions, search 1,500+ policies by CPT code, and get real-time alerts when any payer changes coverage.