TL;DR: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services modified NCD 298 governing FDG PET for myocardial viability, with a policy review date of January 9, 2026. This policy does not list specific CPT or HCPCS codes, so billing teams need to cross-reference the general PET scan NCD (§220.6) to confirm code-level coverage.
Quick-Reference Table
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payer | CMS |
| Policy | FDG PET for Myocardial Viability — NCD 298 |
| Policy Code | NCD 298 |
| Change Type | Modified |
| Effective Date | 2026-01-09 |
| Impact Level | Medium |
| Specialties Affected | Cardiology, Nuclear Medicine, Radiology |
| Key Action | Confirm your documentation supports primary or post-inconclusive-SPECT FDG PET use before submitting claims under this NCD |
CMS FDG PET Myocardial Viability Coverage Criteria and Medical Necessity Requirements 2026
The CMS FDG PET myocardial viability coverage policy under NCD 298 in the Medicare system has two distinct coverage pathways. Know which one applies to your patient before the claim goes out.
Pathway 1: Primary or initial diagnostic study. Beginning October 1, 2002, Medicare covers FDG PET as a primary study before revascularization. The patient does not need a prior SPECT to establish medical necessity. Both full ring and partial ring PET scanners are covered under this pathway.
Pathway 2: Following an inconclusive SPECT. If a patient had a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) study with inconclusive results, FDG PET is covered as a follow-up. This pathway has been in place since July 1, 2001. The scanner type limitation — full ring only — applied only through December 31, 2001. After January 1, 2002, both scanner types qualify.
The clinical rationale behind this coverage policy is specific. FDG PET distinguishes between dysfunctional but viable myocardial tissue — sometimes called hibernating myocardium — and scar tissue. That distinction directly drives management decisions for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction. CMS covers this test because it changes what happens to the patient, not just because it produces an image.
Medical necessity here centers on one question: does this patient have partial loss of heart muscle movement or hibernating myocardium that could respond to revascularization? If the clinical picture doesn't raise that question, neither coverage pathway applies.
Prior authorization is not explicitly required under NCD 298. But that doesn't mean documentation is optional. The referring physician must maintain records showing the clinical conditions are met. That documentation lives in the beneficiary's medical record. If your billing team ever needs to defend a claim, that's where the proof has to be.
CMS FDG PET Myocardial Viability Exclusions and Non-Covered Indications
There is one hard exclusion in this coverage policy, and it's asymmetric in a way that catches billing teams off guard.
If a patient gets a SPECT with inconclusive results, a follow-up FDG PET is covered. But the reverse is not true. If a patient gets an FDG PET with inconclusive results, a follow-up SPECT is not covered under Medicare.
This asymmetry isn't a minor technical point. It has real claim denial exposure. If your clinical team runs FDG PET first and gets an inconclusive read, then orders SPECT to try again, that SPECT claim will not survive Medicare review under NCD 298. Train your cardiology and nuclear medicine teams on this before it becomes a write-off.
The policy does not list any other categorical exclusions. There are no documented carve-outs by diagnosis code, patient age, or scanner model beyond the early 2001–2002 scanner type restrictions — which are now historical and don't affect current billing.
Coverage Indications at a Glance
| Indication | Status | Relevant Codes | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDG PET as primary study before revascularization (ischemic cardiomyopathy / LV dysfunction) | Covered | See NCD §220.6 for PET codes | Effective October 1, 2002 onward; full and partial ring scanners covered |
| FDG PET following inconclusive SPECT | Covered | See NCD §220.6 for PET codes | Effective July 1, 2001 onward; both scanner types covered as of January 1, 2002 |
| SPECT following inconclusive FDG PET | Not Covered | See NCD §220.12 for SPECT codes | Explicitly excluded under NCD 298 limitations |
| FDG PET (full ring only), July 1 – December 31, 2001 | Covered (historical) | N/A | Only relevant for historical claim research; no current billing impact |
| FDG PET (partial ring scanners), July 1 – December 31, 2001 | Not Covered (historical) | N/A | Scanner restriction lifted January 1, 2002 |
CMS FDG PET Myocardial Viability Billing Guidelines and Action Items 2026
This policy has been stable since its last clinical review in September 2002, but the January 9, 2026 effective date on this modification means CMS touched it. Review your current workflows against these criteria now.
| # | Action Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm which coverage pathway applies before submitting the claim. Is this a primary study before revascularization, or a follow-up to an inconclusive SPECT? Your claim needs to reflect the clinical scenario accurately. Mismatching the pathway to the documentation is a fast route to a claim denial. |
| 2 | Audit your referring physician documentation. NCD 298 puts the documentation burden explicitly on the referring physician's medical record. Before January 9, 2026, verify your intake process captures the clinical rationale — hibernating myocardium, ischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular dysfunction — in the referring note, not just the imaging order. |
| 3 | Stop SPECT orders after an inconclusive FDG PET. Brief your cardiology and nuclear medicine schedulers on the asymmetry: SPECT after FDG PET is not a covered sequence. If clinicians want a second look after an inconclusive PET, that clinical conversation needs to happen before the order is placed — not after you've already submitted a SPECT claim. |
| 4 | Cross-reference NCD §220.6 for FDG PET billing codes. NCD 298 does not list specific CPT or HCPCS codes. FDG PET myocardial viability billing lives under the general PET scan NCD at §220.6. Pull that NCD and confirm your charge capture reflects the correct codes for your scanner type and clinical indication. |
| 5 | Cross-reference NCD §220.12 for SPECT codes. If you bill SPECT studies that feed into FDG PET decisions, review the SPECT NCD to confirm those claims are airtight before the PET claim follows. An inconclusive SPECT result documented correctly sets up the FDG PET coverage. A SPECT claim that doesn't survive scrutiny can destabilize the downstream PET reimbursement. |
| 6 | Check your MAC for any local coverage determination overlays. NCD 298 is a national policy, but your Medicare Administrative Contractor may have issued an LCD that adds criteria or documentation requirements for FDG PET in your region. NCD 298 sets the floor — your MAC can build on it. |
If the January 9, 2026 modification introduced wording changes you're not sure how to apply to your patient mix, loop in your compliance officer before submitting claims under the updated version.
| Previous Version | Current Version |
|---|---|
| Coverage is considered experimental and investigational for all indications | Coverage is considered medically necessary when specific criteria are met |
| Prior authorization is not required | Prior authorization is required for initial treatment |
| Documentation must include clinical history | Documentation must include clinical history |
| Re-review every 24 months | Re-review every 12 months with updated clinical documentation |
CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-10 Codes for FDG PET Myocardial Viability Under NCD 298
Covered CPT Codes (When Selection Criteria Are Met)
NCD 298 does not list specific CPT or HCPCS codes. For FDG PET myocardial viability billing, you must reference the general PET scan NCD at §220.6 in the Medicare Coverage Database for the applicable procedure codes. Do not assume a code is covered under this NCD without verifying it against §220.6.
For SPECT billing referenced in coverage pathway 2, refer to NCD §220.12.
| Code Source | Where to Find It |
|---|---|
| FDG PET procedure codes | NCD §220.6 (CMS Medicare Coverage Database) |
| SPECT procedure codes | NCD §220.12 (CMS Medicare Coverage Database) |
Not Covered / Experimental Codes
No specific "not covered" CPT or HCPCS codes are listed in NCD 298. The non-covered indication — SPECT following inconclusive FDG PET — would use SPECT procedure codes found under NCD §220.12. Submitting those codes after an inconclusive FDG PET will not meet medical necessity under NCD 298.
Key ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes
NCD 298 does not specify ICD-10-CM codes. Diagnosis codes for ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction are the clinically relevant diagnoses driving coverage. Work with your cardiology coders to confirm the ICD-10-CM codes on the claim reflect those conditions accurately. A mismatch between the diagnosis code and the clinical rationale documented in the referring note is a common reason these claims get flagged.
Get the Full Picture
Track this policy across versions, search 1,500+ policies by CPT code, and get real-time alerts when any payer changes coverage.