CMS FDG PET for Refractory Seizures: NCD 294 Coverage Policy Update (2026)
CMS has issued a modification to National Coverage Determination 294, which governs Medicare coverage of FDG-PET imaging for pre-surgical evaluation of refractory seizures. If your facility or practice performs—or refers for—fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in epilepsy patients, this update warrants a close review of your documentation and billing workflows. Here's what the policy says, what it requires, and what your team should do now.
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payer | CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) |
| Policy | FDG PET for Refractory Seizures |
| Policy Code | NCD 294 |
| Change Type | Modified |
| Effective Date | 2026-03-12 |
| Impact Level | Medium |
| Specialties Affected | Neurology, Epileptology, Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, Neurosurgery |
| Key Action | Confirm all FDG-PET claims are tied to pre-surgical evaluation documentation before the March 12, 2026 effective date. |
What CMS NCD 294 Covers: FDG-PET for Refractory Seizure Localization
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services established coverage for FDG-PET in the context of refractory seizures effective July 1, 2001, and NCD 294 has governed that coverage ever since. The 2026 modification updates the policy record — meaning billing teams need to treat this as a live, active document requiring fresh review rather than a static legacy policy.
Under NCD 294, Medicare covers FDG-PET imaging specifically for pre-surgical evaluation when the clinical goal is to localize a focus of refractory seizure activity. That's a narrow, well-defined indication, and every claim touching this policy should be evaluated against it precisely.
The policy falls under the Medicare benefit category of Diagnostic Tests (other). It is also cross-referenced to the broader PET Scans NCD (§220.6), which governs PET imaging coverage more generally — a critical detail for facilities billing FDG-PET across multiple indications.
Coverage Criteria: What Medicare Requires for FDG-PET Refractory Seizure Claims
CMS coverage under NCD 294 hinges on a specific clinical context. The imaging must be performed as part of a pre-surgical evaluation — not for ongoing monitoring, diagnostic confirmation outside a surgical workup, or any other clinical purpose related to epilepsy management.
The covered indication:
| # | Covered Indication |
|---|---|
| 1 | FDG-PET for localization of a focus of refractory seizure activity, where the patient is being evaluated as a candidate for surgical intervention |
The limitation:
| # | Covered Indication |
|---|---|
| 1 | Coverage is restricted exclusively to pre-surgical evaluation. FDG-PET ordered outside of a surgical evaluation pathway does not meet medical necessity under this NCD. |
This is a hard coverage limit, not a soft guideline. Claims submitted without documentation supporting the pre-surgical evaluation context are at significant risk for denial or recoupment.
Documentation Requirements Under NCD 294
CMS is explicit about where medical necessity documentation must live: the referring physician's records. The policy states that documentation confirming the covered indication should be maintained by the referring physician in the beneficiary's medical record as standard practice.
This has direct implications for how your billing team approaches claims:
- The imaging facility or hospital submitting the claim is not solely responsible for documentation — the referring physician's chart is the primary evidence of medical necessity
- If your facility is the imaging provider, you need a process to obtain or confirm that the referring physician has documented the pre-surgical evaluation context before you submit
- Audits and post-payment reviews will look to the referring physician's record, not just the imaging report, to confirm coverage criteria are met
This referral-source documentation requirement is worth building into your intake and authorization workflows explicitly. A clean imaging report is not sufficient on its own if the ordering physician's record doesn't reflect the pre-surgical evaluation rationale.
Prior Authorization and Claims Processing for FDG-PET Under Medicare
NCD 294 does not specify a prior authorization requirement within the policy text itself. However, billing teams should be aware that Medicare Advantage plans — which follow NCD guidance as a floor but may layer additional requirements on top — often do require prior auth for PET imaging. If your patient population includes Medicare Advantage enrollees, prior authorization rules from the specific plan apply separately from this NCD.
For traditional Medicare fee-for-service, claims processing instructions reference Transmittal 527 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual (R527CP). Your billing team should confirm that claims are coded and submitted in alignment with those instructions.
| Previous Version | Current Version |
|---|---|
| Coverage is considered experimental and investigational for all indications | Coverage is considered medically necessary when specific criteria are met |
| Prior authorization is not required | Prior authorization is required for initial treatment |
| Documentation must include clinical history | Documentation must include clinical history |
| Re-review every 24 months | Re-review every 12 months with updated clinical documentation |
Affected Codes
The policy data for NCD 294 does not list specific CPT or HCPCS codes. Billing teams should reference the cross-referenced PET Scans NCD (§220.6) for applicable procedure codes associated with FDG-PET imaging, and confirm current code assignments with your Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC). No ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes are enumerated in the policy document.
What this means operationally: The absence of enumerated codes in NCD 294 itself makes MAC-level guidance and the §220.6 cross-reference especially important. Do not assume that any FDG-PET code is automatically covered under this NCD without confirming the full coding and clinical context against both NCDs and your MAC's local guidance.
What Your Billing Team Should Do
| # | Action Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | Audit open and recent FDG-PET claims now (before March 12, 2026). Pull any pending or recently submitted claims associated with epilepsy or seizure diagnoses and confirm each one reflects a pre-surgical evaluation context. Claims without that documentation are exposure. |
| 2 | Update your intake checklist for FDG-PET orders to capture pre-surgical evaluation status. When a referral comes in for FDG-PET in a seizure patient, your team should confirm — before the scan occurs — that the referring physician's chart documents the surgical evaluation rationale. Add this as a required field in your order intake or prior auth workflow. |
| 3 | Contact your MAC for current applicable procedure codes. Since NCD 294 does not enumerate specific CPT or HCPCS codes, reach out to your Medicare Administrative Contractor to confirm which codes they recognize for FDG-PET in the refractory seizure context under this NCD and §220.6. |
| 4 | Brief your neurology and neurosurgery referring partners on documentation requirements. The policy places documentation responsibility on the referring physician. A brief communication to your neurology and epileptology referral sources—reminding them to document pre-surgical evaluation context clearly—will reduce claim risk downstream. |
| 5 | Review Medicare Advantage plan requirements separately. If your payer mix includes Medicare Advantage, pull the FDG-PET prior authorization requirements for each plan. NCD 294 sets the coverage floor, but MA plans may require additional steps that traditional Medicare does not. |
Get the Full Picture
Track this policy across versions, search 1,500+ policies by CPT code, and get real-time alerts when any payer changes coverage.