TL;DR: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services modified NCD 104 governing diagnostic endocardial electrical stimulation (EES), with an effective date of March 7, 2026. Here's what billing teams need to know.
CMS diagnostic endocardial electrical stimulation coverage policy under NCD 104 in the Medicare system covers EES for patients with severe cardiac arrhythmias. This policy governs procedures performed across outpatient hospital, physician services, and other diagnostic test benefit categories. The policy does not list specific CPT or HCPCS codes — which creates a documentation problem your team needs to address before March 7, 2026.
Quick-Reference Table
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payer | CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) |
| Policy | Diagnostic Endocardial Electrical Stimulation (Pacing) |
| Policy Code | NCD 104 |
| Change Type | Modified |
| Effective Date | 2026-03-07 |
| Impact Level | Medium |
| Specialties Affected | Electrophysiology, Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Outpatient Hospital Billing |
| Key Action | Audit your EES claims for medical necessity documentation before March 7, 2026 — coverage requires a diagnosis of severe cardiac arrhythmia |
CMS Diagnostic Endocardial Electrical Stimulation Coverage Criteria and Medical Necessity Requirements 2026
The coverage policy under NCD 104 is narrow by design. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services covers EES — also called programmed electrical stimulation of the heart — only for patients with severe cardiac arrhythmias. That's the entire medical necessity threshold, stated plainly.
What makes this interesting is what CMS chose to include in the procedure description. EES requires intracardiac electrode catheters, intracardiac and extracardiac recordings, and a stimulator device. Two to six multipolar electrode catheters are inserted percutaneously — usually through the femoral veins — and advanced to the heart under fluoroscopic control. Other venous or arterial routes are also permitted.
The principal use CMS recognizes is diagnosis and treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia. But the policy also covers EES for other complex arrhythmias, conduction defects, and evaluation after cardiac arrest. This is broader than some billing teams realize. If your cardiologists are using EES only for VT workups, you may be leaving covered indications on the table.
One specific exclusion is baked into the procedure description itself. An intracardiac His bundle cardiogram is typically obtained during EES. CMS will not recognize a separate charge for it. The His bundle cardiogram is considered bundled — no separate billing, no separate line item. If your charge capture currently breaks this out, stop it before the March 7, 2026 effective date.
EES is also used to identify patients at risk of sudden arrhythmic death. CMS acknowledges this as a legitimate clinical use within the policy. That matters for your documentation strategy — the clinical reason needs to map to severe arrhythmia risk, not just a general cardiac workup.
Prior authorization requirements are not explicitly called out in NCD 104 for EES. That doesn't mean your Medicare Advantage plans won't require prior auth — they often impose requirements beyond what the NCD specifies. Verify with each MA plan separately, and check whether your MAC has a local coverage determination that adds prior authorization requirements on top of this national policy. LCDs from your Medicare Administrative Contractor can be stricter than the NCD, and they're the ones who adjudicate your claims.
The coverage policy spans three benefit categories: diagnostic services in outpatient hospital, diagnostic tests (other), and physicians' services. That means this NCD applies whether you're billing in a facility or professional setting. Your hospital outpatient billing team and your physician billing team both need to know this policy.
CMS Diagnostic Endocardial Electrical Stimulation Exclusions and Non-Covered Indications
NCD 104 does not contain a formal experimental or investigational designation for any specific EES indication. But the coverage boundary is clear: EES is covered for severe cardiac arrhythmias. Anything outside that definition is not covered.
This is where claim denial risk lives. If a physician orders EES for a patient who doesn't have a documented severe arrhythmia, that claim will not survive a coverage review. The diagnosis code on the claim has to support the severity threshold CMS requires.
CMS is also explicit about the His bundle cardiogram. It's listed as a non-separately-billable service, not as a covered add-on. There's no gray area here — bill it separately and you're billing for a non-covered service. That's a compliance issue, not just a denial issue.
Coverage Indications at a Glance
| Indication | Status | Relevant Codes | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severe cardiac arrhythmias (general) | Covered | Not specified by NCD | Medical necessity documentation required |
| Sustained ventricular tachycardia (diagnosis and treatment) | Covered | Not specified by NCD | Principal use recognized by CMS |
| Complex arrhythmias and conduction defects | Covered | Not specified by NCD | Must document severity |
| EES after cardiac arrest | Covered | Not specified by NCD | EES has proven value per NCD language |
| Identifying patients at risk of sudden arrhythmic death | Covered | Not specified by NCD | Clinical rationale must link to severe arrhythmia risk |
| His bundle cardiogram (obtained during EES) | Not separately covered | Not specified by NCD | Bundled — no separate charge recognized by CMS |
| EES without documented severe cardiac arrhythmia | Not covered | N/A | Fails medical necessity threshold |
CMS Diagnostic Endocardial Electrical Stimulation Billing Guidelines and Action Items 2026
| # | Action Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | Audit your His bundle cardiogram charge capture before March 7, 2026. If your charge capture includes a separate line for the His bundle cardiogram obtained during EES, remove it now. CMS explicitly states it will not recognize a separate charge. Any claim with this billed separately is a denial — and potentially a compliance exposure depending on how long it's been going out. |
| 2 | Confirm your diagnosis codes support "severe" cardiac arrhythmia. The medical necessity bar is severity, not just presence of arrhythmia. Review your ICD-10-CM code selection with your clinical documentation improvement team. If your physicians are documenting "arrhythmia" without severity qualifiers, that's a documentation gap that will follow every EES claim. |
| 3 | Check your MAC's local coverage determination for EES. NCD 104 sets the national floor. Your Medicare Administrative Contractor may have an LCD that adds billing guidelines, documentation requirements, or prior authorization requirements. Pull your MAC's LCD and compare it to NCD 104 before the effective date. If your MAC's rules are stricter, those are the rules you follow. |
| 4 | Verify prior auth requirements with each Medicare Advantage plan in your mix. NCD 104 doesn't mention prior authorization — but MA plans operate under their own rules. Some impose prior auth on EPS/EES procedures even when the NCD is silent. Call your top MA payers or pull their coverage policies directly. Do this before March 7, 2026, not after your first denial. |
| 5 | Identify which benefit category applies for each claim. NCD 104 covers three benefit categories — outpatient hospital diagnostic services, other diagnostic tests, and physicians' services. Make sure your facility billing team and your professional billing team are both applying this policy correctly. The coverage policy applies in both settings, but the coding and reimbursement paths are different. |
| 6 | Document fluoroscopic guidance and catheter approach in the procedure note. CMS's procedure description is detailed — percutaneous insertion, femoral vein approach, fluoroscopic control, two to six multipolar electrode catheters. Your documentation needs to reflect the procedure as performed. If the approach varies (arterial route, alternate venous access), document that explicitly. Thin procedure notes are a fast path to claim denial. |
| 7 | If your compliance officer hasn't reviewed your EES billing in the last 12 months, now is the time. This policy modification is a good trigger for a focused audit. Ask them to pull a sample of EES claims, check the diagnosis codes for severity documentation, and verify the His bundle cardiogram isn't breaking out separately. If you're not sure how this applies to your payer mix or your MAC's LCD, loop in your billing consultant before the effective date. |
| Previous Version | Current Version |
|---|---|
| Coverage is considered experimental and investigational for all indications | Coverage is considered medically necessary when specific criteria are met |
| Prior authorization is not required | Prior authorization is required for initial treatment |
| Documentation must include clinical history | Documentation must include clinical history |
| Re-review every 24 months | Re-review every 12 months with updated clinical documentation |
CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-10 Codes for Diagnostic Endocardial Electrical Stimulation Under NCD 104
NCD 104 does not list specific CPT, HCPCS, or ICD-10 codes. This is not an oversight — some national coverage determinations describe covered procedures at a clinical level without tying them to specific codes. The absence of a code list means your coding team carries more responsibility, not less.
What This Means for Endocardial Electrical Stimulation Billing
NCD 104 lists no CPT or HCPCS codes. Your coding team must identify the correct codes through their own coding resources and MAC guidance. Do not use this blog post as a source for code selection — we do not provide code suggestions, ranges, or examples for this policy.
The lack of a code list in NCD 104 creates a specific risk: your coders may be applying codes that technically describe the procedure but aren't the ones your MAC recognizes for EES coverage. A mismatch between code and NCD results in a denial that looks like a coverage issue but is actually a code selection issue. These are hard to catch without a targeted audit.
The same applies to ICD-10-CM codes. NCD 104 does not identify specific ICD-10 codes. "Severe cardiac arrhythmia" is a clinical standard, not a specific ICD-10 code. Work with your clinical documentation improvement team to build a crosswalk using their coding resources and MAC guidance. Your medical director and compliance officer should sign off on the final list.
Get the Full Picture
Track this policy across versions, search 1,500+ policies by CPT code, and get real-time alerts when any payer changes coverage.