TL;DR: Cigna Healthcare modified UM-47, its Lack of Information (LOI) Retrospective Review policy, effective February 18, 2026. Here's what changes for billing teams handling post-service claim reviews.
Cigna Healthcare updated coverage policy UM-47 to establish a consistent process for handling retrospective (post-service) reviews that get "pending" status due to missing clinical information. This policy does not list specific CPT, HCPCS, or ICD-10 codes — it applies broadly across any claim where Cigna cannot make a medical necessity determination because documentation is incomplete. If your team regularly submits post-service claims to Cigna, this change directly affects how those claims move through the review pipeline.
Quick-Reference Table
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payer | Cigna Healthcare |
| Policy | Lack of Information (LOI) Retrospective Review |
| Policy Code | UM-47 |
| Change Type | Modified |
| Effective Date | February 18, 2026 |
| Impact Level | High |
| Specialties Affected | All specialties billing post-service claims to Cigna |
| Key Action | Audit your retrospective claim documentation process now — incomplete records trigger a "pending" status under this updated policy |
Cigna Lack of Information Retrospective Review Coverage Policy and Medical Necessity Requirements 2026
The core of UM-47 is straightforward: when Cigna receives a post-service claim and cannot find enough clinical information to make a coverage decision, they will "pend" that claim rather than immediately deny it.
That sounds like good news. It is — but only if your team knows what "reasonably necessary" clinical information means in Cigna's framework and has a process to respond fast.
The real issue here is that "lack of information" decisions create a gray zone in your accounts receivable. A pending claim is not an approved claim. It's not a denied claim either. It sits in limbo, generating no reimbursement while your team figures out what Cigna is asking for.
The UM-47 coverage policy update formalizes this process. Cigna is essentially building a consistent lane for LOI-related pends — which means your billing team needs a consistent lane to respond to them. If you don't have a defined workflow for retrospective review requests, you need one before February 18, 2026.
Why "Pending" Is Different from "Denied" — and Why It Matters for Reimbursement
A claim denial triggers your appeals clock. A pending claim does not — at least not in the same way. Your team needs to understand that a pending LOI status under UM-47 is a request for documentation, not a coverage decision.
The medical necessity determination is still open. Cigna is telling you: send us the clinical records and we'll make a call. If you treat a pended claim like a denial, you may miss the response window and turn a winnable LOI situation into an actual denial.
This is where prior authorization habits can help you. If your team already tracks prior authorization requests, documentation submission timelines, and follow-up workflows, apply that same rigor here. The mechanism is different — prior auth happens before service, this happens after — but the documentation discipline is identical.
Cigna LOI Retrospective Review Exclusions and Non-Covered Indications
The UM-47 policy summary does not list specific exclusions or non-covered indications. This policy governs the administrative process for handling information gaps — it is not a clinical coverage policy that designates certain diagnoses or procedures as non-covered.
What this means practically: UM-47 doesn't tell you what Cigna covers. It tells you what Cigna does when they can't determine whether a claim meets their coverage criteria. The underlying medical necessity criteria come from Cigna's other clinical coverage policies, not UM-47.
If you're fighting a coverage denial — not an LOI pend — you're looking at a different Cigna policy. Talk to your billing consultant to identify the right policy for your specific service line.
Coverage Indications at a Glance
Because UM-47 is an administrative process policy — not a clinical coverage policy — it does not list specific clinical indications. The table below reflects what the policy does and does not govern.
| Indication | Status | Relevant Codes | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-service claims with incomplete clinical documentation | Eligible for LOI Pend (not denied outright) | Not specified in UM-47 | Cigna will pend and request additional information rather than issuing immediate denial |
| Claims with sufficient clinical documentation | Proceeds to standard retrospective review determination | Not specified in UM-47 | No LOI pend triggered — medical necessity review proceeds normally |
| Claims where documentation is not submitted after LOI request | Risk of denial after pend | Not specified in UM-47 | Failure to respond to LOI request likely results in denial; confirm timelines with your Cigna rep |
Cigna Lack of Information Retrospective Review Billing Guidelines and Action Items 2026
Here's what your billing team should do before and after the February 18, 2026 effective date.
| # | Action Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | Audit your retrospective claim documentation workflow now. Identify every post-service claim type your team submits to Cigna. For each, confirm that your team knows exactly what clinical documentation supports a medical necessity determination. Don't wait for a pend to discover you have a documentation gap. |
| 2 | Build a dedicated LOI response queue in your practice management system. When a Cigna claim comes back with a pend status citing lack of information, it needs a specific workflow — not just a note in the general task list. Assign ownership, set a response deadline, and track it separately from your standard claim denial queue. |
| 3 | Train your billing team on the difference between a pend and a denial. This is not a semantic point. The response process, timeline, and documentation requirements differ. Misclassifying a pend as a denial — or vice versa — creates AR errors and missed reimbursement windows. |
| 4 | Confirm Cigna's response timeframes for LOI requests. UM-47 establishes the process for pending these claims, but your Cigna provider relations contact or your billing consultant should be able to give you the specific timeframe Cigna allows for documentation submission before the pend converts to a denial. Get that number and build it into your workflow. |
| 5 | Pull a sample of your retrospective Cigna claims from the last 90 days. Look for any that were pended for missing information. How long did they sit before your team responded? How many converted to denials? This is your baseline — use it to measure whether UM-47 actually helps or hurts your AR over the next two quarters. |
| 6 | Loop in your compliance officer if you're unsure how UM-47 intersects with your specific service lines. UM-47 applies broadly, but your compliance officer can help you assess whether your documentation practices meet Cigna's "reasonably necessary" standard for your specialty. Do this before February 18, 2026, not after a wave of pends hits your AR. |
| Previous Version | Current Version |
|---|---|
| Coverage is considered experimental and investigational for all indications | Coverage is considered medically necessary when specific criteria are met |
| Prior authorization is not required | Prior authorization is required for initial treatment |
| Documentation must include clinical history | Documentation must include clinical history |
| Re-review every 24 months | Re-review every 12 months with updated clinical documentation |
CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-10 Codes for Lack of Information Retrospective Review Under UM-47
The UM-47 policy does not list specific CPT, HCPCS, or ICD-10 codes. This is a process policy — it applies to any post-service claim submitted to Cigna where sufficient clinical information is not available to make a coverage or medical necessity determination.
There are no code-level exclusions or coverage designations in this policy. The billing guidelines here apply across all procedure codes your team submits on a retrospective basis to Cigna Healthcare.
This is intentional on Cigna's part. UM-47 is a universal administrative process, not a clinical coverage policy tied to specific services. The absence of codes does not mean the policy has low exposure — it means every post-service Cigna claim your team submits falls within scope.
If you're looking for procedure-specific medical necessity criteria, those live in Cigna's clinical coverage policies, organized by service type. The UM-47 Cigna system policy governs what happens when those criteria can't be evaluated because the information isn't there yet.
Get the Full Picture
Track this policy across versions, search 1,500+ policies by CPT code, and get real-time alerts when any payer changes coverage.