Cigna modified MM 0011 for transcatheter closure of cardiovascular defects, effective November 15, 2025. Here's what billing teams need to know before claims go out the door.
Cigna Healthcare updated coverage position criteria under MM 0011 in the Cigna system, covering transcatheter and perventricular approaches to closing secundum atrial septal defects (ASD), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), patent foramen ovale (PFO), ventricular septal defects (VSD), and related cardiovascular structural defects. The two codes directly named in this policy — CPT 33999 and CPT 93799 — are both classified as Experimental/Investigational/Unproven for specific indications. If your cardiology or cardiovascular surgery program bills either of those unlisted codes, this update has real claim denial exposure.
Quick-Reference Table
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payer | Cigna Healthcare |
| Policy | Transcatheter Closure of Cardiovascular Defects |
| Policy Code | MM 0011 |
| Change Type | Modified |
| Effective Date | November 15, 2025 |
| Impact Level | High |
| Specialties Affected | Cardiology, Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiovascular Surgery, Interventional Cardiology |
| Key Action | Audit any claims using CPT 33999 or 93799 for transcatheter cardiovascular closure procedures before November 15, 2025 |
Cigna Transcatheter Cardiovascular Closure Coverage Criteria and Medical Necessity Requirements 2025
The Cigna transcatheter closure of cardiovascular defects coverage policy — MM 0011 — addresses a wide range of structural heart conditions. It covers neonates, infants, children, and adults, so this isn't just a pediatric cardiology issue. Your adult structural heart program is equally exposed.
The procedures addressed under this policy include:
| # | Covered Indication |
|---|---|
| 1 | Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) |
| 2 | Closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) |
| 3 | Closure of fenestration following a Fontan procedure |
| 4 | Closure of muscular or perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) |
| 5 | Closure of known patent foramen ovale (PFO) |
| 6 | Closure of ostium primum or sinus venosus atrial septal defect |
| 7 | Perventricular (transmyocardial) closure of VSDs using cardiac occlusion devices |
The policy uses cardiac occlusion devices as the mechanism across these indications. Medical necessity determinations under this coverage policy will hinge on which specific defect type you're treating and how the claim is coded.
The real issue here is what falls outside covered status. Two of the most commonly used unlisted codes in cardiovascular surgery — CPT 33999 and CPT 93799 — are explicitly classified as Experimental/Investigational/Unproven for specific indications under this policy. That classification directly blocks reimbursement for those indications. The full qualifying language that defines which indications trigger E/I/U status is available in the complete MM 0011 policy text. Review it before billing either code.
Before your team submits any claim involving these procedures, confirm the specific defect type and approach against the full policy. Medical necessity documentation needs to be airtight — the diagnosis, the anatomical defect, the approach, and the device used all need to tell a consistent story.
For high-cost structural heart procedures like these, follow your standard prior authorization process. Check your Cigna contract and plan-level benefits before the November 15, 2025 effective date.
Cigna Transcatheter Closure Exclusions and Non-Covered Indications
This is where MM 0011 does the most damage to revenue cycle teams that aren't paying attention.
CPT 33999 (Unlisted procedure, cardiac surgery) and CPT 93799 (Unlisted cardiovascular service or procedure) are both flagged as Experimental/Investigational/Unproven for specific indications under this policy. Claims for services designated as Experimental/Investigational/Unproven are generally not covered under Cigna policies. Consult the full policy text for the specific qualifying indications.
Unlisted codes are already high-risk for claim denial under any payer — they require manual review, detailed documentation, and a clear rationale for why no specific CPT code exists. Under MM 0011, that risk is compounded because Cigna has stated explicitly that certain uses of these codes fall into the Experimental/Investigational/Unproven bucket.
The policy does not spell out in the available summary language exactly which indications trigger the E/I/U classification for each unlisted code. That ambiguity is real, and it's not your team's fault. Talk to your compliance officer before the November 15, 2025 effective date if you routinely bill either of these codes for structural heart closure procedures.
Coverage Indications at a Glance
| Indication | Status | Relevant Codes | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) — transcatheter closure | Policy addresses this indication; review full policy text for coverage criteria | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 (if no specific code available) | Document medical necessity thoroughly |
| Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) — transcatheter closure | Policy addresses this indication; review full policy text for coverage criteria | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 (if no specific code available) | Verify plan-level benefit before billing |
| Fenestration closure following Fontan procedure | Policy addresses this indication; review full policy text for coverage criteria | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 (if no specific code available) | Pediatric-heavy indication; confirm medical necessity criteria |
| Muscular VSD — transcatheter closure | Policy addresses this indication; review full policy text for coverage criteria | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 (if no specific code available) | High documentation standard expected |
| Perimembranous VSD — transcatheter closure | Policy addresses this indication; review full policy text for coverage criteria | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 (if no specific code available) | Higher complexity; consult full policy before billing |
| Patent foramen ovale (PFO) — transcatheter closure | Policy addresses this indication; review full policy text for coverage criteria | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 (if no specific code available) | PFO closure has historically been contentious across payers |
| Ostium primum or sinus venosus ASD — transcatheter closure | Policy addresses this indication; review full policy text for coverage criteria | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 (if no specific code available) | Less common; verify separately |
| Perventricular (transmyocardial) VSD closure — cardiac occlusion devices | Policy addresses this indication; CPT 33999 and CPT 93799 carry E/I/U designation for specific indications — review full policy text | CPT 33999, CPT 93799 | Review complete MM 0011 policy before billing; consult compliance officer if uncertain |
Cigna Transcatheter Cardiovascular Defect Billing Guidelines and Action Items 2025
Cigna transcatheter closure billing requires a tighter pre-claim workflow than most cardiovascular procedures. Here's what to do before and after November 15, 2025.
| # | Action Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | Audit every open or pending claim using CPT 33999 or CPT 93799 for transcatheter cardiovascular closure — do it before November 15, 2025. Identify which specific defect type and approach each claim covers. Flag any that involve indications Cigna may classify as Experimental/Investigational/Unproven under the full policy text. |
| 2 | Map your procedure mix to the specific indications in MM 0011. Secundum ASD, PDA, Fontan fenestration, muscular VSD, perimembranous VSD, PFO, and sinus venosus ASD all appear in this policy. Your charge capture workflow needs to distinguish between them. |
| 3 | Check whether a more specific CPT code exists before defaulting to unlisted codes. CPT 33999 and 93799 are the codes named in this policy, but they're unlisted codes — payers always prefer a more specific code. Your cardiovascular coders should confirm current CPT guidance for each defect closure type. Unlisted codes should be the last option, not the default. |
| 4 | Follow your standard prior authorization workflow for all Cigna structural heart cases. Transcatheter cardiovascular closure procedures across these indications are high-cost, high-scrutiny cases. Check your Cigna contract and plan-level benefits before the November 15, 2025 effective date. |
| 5 | Strengthen your medical necessity documentation templates for each defect type. The operative report, imaging, echocardiography findings, and clinical rationale all need to support the specific indication you're billing. Generic documentation won't survive a Cigna medical review on these cases. |
| 6 | Loop in your compliance officer if your program bills either CPT 33999 or CPT 93799 for any of the indications addressed in MM 0011. The Experimental/Investigational/Unproven designation applies to specific indications as defined in the full policy text. Your compliance officer needs to review the complete policy and determine whether any of your current workflows require a coverage exception process or appeals workflow before the effective date. |
| Previous Version | Current Version |
|---|---|
| Coverage is considered experimental and investigational for all indications | Coverage is considered medically necessary when specific criteria are met |
| Prior authorization is not required | Prior authorization is required for initial treatment |
| Documentation must include clinical history | Documentation must include clinical history |
| Re-review every 24 months | Re-review every 12 months with updated clinical documentation |
CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-10 Codes for Transcatheter Cardiovascular Closure Under MM 0011
The policy data for MM 0011 includes two CPT codes. Both are unlisted codes, and both carry an Experimental/Investigational/Unproven designation for specific indications. No HCPCS Level II codes and no ICD-10-CM codes are listed in the policy data for this coverage position.
Not Covered / Experimental Codes (When Used for Specific Indications)
| Code | Type | Description | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33999 | CPT | Unlisted procedure, cardiac surgery | Considered Experimental/Investigational/Unproven when used for specific transcatheter cardiovascular closure indications |
| 93799 | CPT | Unlisted cardiovascular service or procedure | Considered Experimental/Investigational/Unproven when used for specific transcatheter cardiovascular closure indications |
No ICD-10-CM codes are listed in the MM 0011 policy data. Standard diagnosis coding guidelines apply. Consult your coding resources for appropriate diagnosis codes for each structural heart defect type you bill. The absence of ICD-10 codes in this policy doesn't reduce your documentation obligation — it increases it.
Get the Full Picture for CPT 33999
Track this policy across versions, search 1,500+ policies by CPT code, and get real-time alerts when any payer changes coverage.